Mating behaviour of males of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glonidae)

Publication Type

Journal Article

Journal Name

Systematic Entomology

Name of Author

Mark K. Schutze, Queensland University of Technology
Nidchaya Aketarawong, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University
Weerawan Amornsak, Kasetsart University
Karen F. Armstrong, Lincoln University
Antonis A. Augustinos, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Norman Barr, USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
Wang Bo, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Kostas Bourtzis, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Laura M. Boykin, The University of Western Australia
Carlos Cáceres, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Stephen L. Cameron, Queensland University of Technology
Toni A. Chapman, Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre
Suksom Chinvinijkul, Thailand Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives
Anastasija Chomič, Lincoln University
Marc De Meyer, Royal Museum for Central Africa
Ellena Drosopoulou, School of Biology
Anna Englezou, Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre
Sunday Ekesi, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology Nairobi
Angeliki Gariou-Papalexiou, University of Patras
Scott M. Geib, USDA Agricultural Research Service
Deborah Hailstones, Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre
Mohammed Hasanuzzaman, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Dhaka
David Haymer, John A. Burns School of Medicine
Alvin K.W. Hee, Universiti Putra Malaysia
Jorge Hendrichs, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Andrew Jessup, NSW Department of Primary Industries
Qinge Ji, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
Fathiya M. Khamis, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology Nairobi

Publication Date

4-1-2015

Abstract

Bactrocera papayae Drew & Hancock, Bactrocera philippinensis Drew & Hancock, Bactrocera carambolae Drew & Hancock, and Bactrocera invadens Drew, Tsuruta & White are four horticultural pest tephritid fruit fly species that are highly similar, morphologically and genetically, to the destructive pest, the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). This similarity has rendered the discovery of reliable diagnostic characters problematic, which, in view of the economic importance of these taxa and the international trade implications, has resulted in ongoing difficulties for many areas of plant protection and food security. Consequently, a major international collaborative and integrated multidisciplinary research effort was initiated in 2009 to build upon existing literature with the specific aim of resolving biological species limits among B. papayae, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. invadens and B. dorsalis to overcome constraints to pest management and international trade. Bactrocera philippinensis has recently been synonymized with B. papayae as a result of this initiative and this review corroborates that finding; however, the other names remain in use. While consistent characters have been found to reliably distinguish B. carambolae from B. dorsalis, B. invadens and B. papayae, no such characters have been found to differentiate the latter three putative species. We conclude that B. carambolae is a valid species and that the remaining taxa, B. dorsalis, B. invadens and B. papayae, represent the same species. Thus, we consider B. dorsalis (Hendel) as the senior synonym of B. papayae Drew and Hancock syn.n. and B. invadens Drew, Tsuruta & White syn.n. A redescription of B. dorsalis is provided. Given the agricultural importance of B. dorsalis, this taxonomic decision will have significant global plant biosecurity implications, affecting pest management, quarantine, international trade, postharvest treatment and basic research. Throughout the paper, we emphasize the value of independent and multidisciplinary tools in delimiting species, particularly in complicated cases involving morphologically cryptic taxa.

Share

COinS